Matrixing: The Real 99%

As was stated in several previous articles, we mentioned that 99% of all ghost sightings, photographs, and videos are simple mistaken identity. We are now going to explain exactly what we mean by that, and what can be done to counter this mis-identification.

We here at the DAPRS believe that most alleged ghost sightings can be easily explained through a simple psychological process that all humans share. Matrixing is the word for the brain’s tendancy to see patterns in completely random visual data. In other words, let’s say that you are staring at a dark hallway in an abandoned hospital. You see a “misty” form develop into what looks like a face. You snap a picture or two, and realize that the picture only adds detail to the supposed face. A good paranormal investigator, before wasting precious battery life, would halt before taking the pictures and realize that an old hospital is filled with dust. This dust is kicked up by the sudden activity in the once empty building. The good investigator would see that his brain is simple forming faces out of the random visual stimuli that is the dust cloud.

Matrixing is the arch enemy of serious paranormal research. It’s no wonder that scientific community is so unwilling to consider our theories. Look at the hundreds of so-called paranormal investigators proudly displaying photos on their blogs and case studies that are clearly nothing more than dust, fog, smoke, or bugs. It’s time that investigators begin the process of weeding out every image that is clearly not a ghost. That means NO cloudy mist figures or strange disembodies mist faces. The only things that the scientific community are interested in are full body apparitions and dimensional rifts that aren’t camera straps.

In order to promote serious consideration of paranormal theories, both the general public and researchers in the community must refuse to by into the garbage seen on the influx of paranormal themed reality TV and instead choose to deny ignorance and develop a standard by which to measure evidence gathered during an investigation.

Just remember…99% of all paranormal accounts are mis-identification. That leaves 1% unexplained. It’s this 1% that researchers need to focus on.

  • Atiriv

    Great Article!! We definitely need this info out there. I’ve come across so many people that swears they see spirit faces in photos when I know it’s just the shadow shades or lighting. Perfect example in photo I posted…It’s just a combination of reflections, but people swear it’s a “ghost” in the mirror.

  • DAPS

    Great Article!! We definitely need this info out there. I’ve come across so many people that swears they see spirit faces in photos when I know it’s just the shadow shades or lighting. Perfect example in photo I posted…It’s just a combination of reflections, but people swear it’s a “ghost” in the mirror.

    • Mandyc_73

      A little harsh, but much truth! That’s why I think U & I need to look @ rest of the pix together, we have enough 1% pix from last investigation already. One U posted on my wall & from me , what I already posted@DAPS & last nights to inbox, to double check what U think…;>< A.C.@~DAPS~

    • Mandyc_73

      A little harsh, but much truth! That’s why I think U & I need to look @ rest of the pix together, we have enough 1% pix from last investigation already. One U posted on my wall & from me , what I already posted@DAPS & last nights to inbox, to double check what U think…;>< A.C.@~DAPS~

    • Mandyc_73

      A little harsh, but much truth! That’s why I think U & I need to look @ rest of the pix together, we have enough 1% pix from last investigation already. One U posted on my wall & from me , what I already posted@DAPS & last nights to inbox, to double check what U think…;>< A.C.@~DAPS~

  • Joanne

    i think its a great article, but my opinion is there is never anything you can always prove even 99% of the time. I am all for debunking and do feel there are way to many investigators that think any speck on the lens is paranormal. But by saying anyone that believes different than you is ignorant is actually kind of ignorant. Unless you have solid proof that everything captured is something else and can physically show it, is that just you making you own assumption also.

  • Matthewherch

    Joanne, we meet again. Haha. I try not to be ignorant, and you may be somewhat correct about my close mindedness on this subject, but you have to admit that their is a lot of disinformation our there regarding orb photos and camera straps. Again, I challenge you to go to a random paranormal site and not find photos submitted as proof, that are really nothing more than dust, bugs, fog, or smoke.

    In order to truly submit a photo for proof, one MUST have environmental data to back it up. Humidity, temperature, photos in different angles, solar activity, and barometric data are important to a photo’s credibility. Finally, EXIF data from the photo should be included.

    Again, this site is about promoting acceptance across a wide range of people. I personally don’t want hundreds of people to believe that every “orb” in their photo album is a ghost. This is dangerous and damaging to the field of paranormal research.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1341150160 Joanne DuPonte

    AH Matthew you are correct we should stop meeting like this lol. I believe I agreed with you that I do think that the paranormal field has way to many “orb groupies” and people who want to believe that everything is paranormal. Well i will first say unless it is something they are presenting to a horrified family and saying look at this picture your house must possess a demon, instead of maybe suggesting a good house cleaner, than yes it is dangerous. But who are they harming by heading into a cemetery and capturing some bugs and wanting to believe they got something. Dont get me wrong I could spend hours online laughing at pictures people are presenting as evidence, but as long as it is not at the expense of a poor family in need of help, well then its there hobby and choice to believe what they want. To be honest, when we are asked to investigate a house for a scared family, we prefer to not investigate at all. We simple come in and conduct our cleansing and make whatever is there leave. Why do they need evidence of something they have been living in fear of for months. Even if I caught the best Class A EVP, is it actually ethical of me to present it to the family to just scare them more. IF the need is help, evidence is not necessary, unless you are looking for the notoriety of it all, which is not what the paranormal field should be about. Faith and a belief in something is very powerful, so if they believe that the moon is a UFO (AHH that poor old man who called 911) by making them feel ashamed or bad about what they believe to be true has nothing but a negative effect on a persons self esteem and then they find themselves questioning everything they always believed to be true. Throwing out a number like 99% is also not very “Scientific” of you. You can not just choose a number and call it fact, can you? oh and you lost me with all the big words too by the way it kind of read like Chinese to me. But with that being said, I hate t be the one to burst anyones bubble but the paranormal field was, is and will continue to be a spiritual field. No true scientist will ever take the paranormal as a serious scientific study. Its just the way it is. It also lets me leave you with my favorite scientific BOOYAKA…I understand you have these big words that you say need to exist for something to be paranormal, but there was a time when Scientist had PROOF the world was flat…and that my new friend is a spiritual “BOOYAKA”……

  • Matthewherch

    Touche? It’s true that scientists once thought they had proof the world was flat. That has been proven to be false. But science is constantly evolving and dispelling old “facts” for updated new ones. As such, I do believe that one day science will begin to accept paranormal phenomena as true once they start to understand quantum theory and the theory of the tenth dimension in greater detail. As for my writing, I try to use a wide vocabulary when writing, as it supplements my speaking in person.

    Finally, I leave you with a famous researcher who questioned the spiritual side of paranormal phenomena: Harry Houdini.